|
|
|
Take Home Exam 2
Chem 452. |
|
|
v(mmol mL-1 min-1) | v(mmol mL-1 min-1) |
| Without Z | With Z | |
| 0.20 | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| 0.40 | 7.5 | 5.0 |
| 0.80 | 10.0 | 7.5 |
| 1.0 | 10.7 | 8.3 |
| 2.0 | 12.5 | 10.7 |
| 4.0 | 13.6 | 12.5 |
2) Although the Lineweaver-Burk plot is the most widely used plotting form for enzyme kinetic data, it suffers a major disadvantage. If linear increments of [S] are used, thereby minimizing measurement errors in the laboratory, data points will be obtained that cluster near the vertical axis in an L-B plot. Thus the intercept of the ordinate can be determined with great accuracy, but the slope of the line will be subject to considerable error, because the least reliable points, those obtained at low substrate concentration, have greater weight in establishing the slope.
Because of the limitation of L-B plots, other linear plots have been devised. The E-H plot, (v vs. v/[S]) is perhaps the most useful.
a) Rearrange
and manipulate the M-M equation to give v as
a function of (v/[S] )(i.e. ,
v = ???). Put it in the slope-intercept form.
b)What is the significance of the 1) slope,
2) the
vertical (y) intercept and 3) the horizontal (x) intercept in a plot of
v
versus
v/[S] ?
c) Data below were obtained for the
hydrolysis
of o-nitrophenyl-b-D-galactoside (ONPG) by E.
coli beta-galactosidase. Use both a Lineweaver-Burk plot and a E-H
plot to determine Km and Vmax. How do they compare? Include
both plots. I suggest you graph them in Excel or something similar
and obtain a linear regression fit. Show your calculations.
| [S],mM | v(mmol mL-1 min-1) |
| 0.50 | 8.93 |
| 1.0 | 14.29 |
| 1.5 | 16.52 |
| 2.0 | 19.20 |
| 2.5 | 19.64 |
This page is maintained by hartsesc@uwec.edu